paper / benedictevans / Jun 12
This work explores the application of relative belief inference for uncertainty quantification, particularly within Poisson models featuring signal and background noise. It establishes that probability theory offers a clear definition of evidence, directly benefiting Bayesian analyses. Relative belief inferences are shown to adhere to Bayesian principles while also meeting frequentist standards like confidence levels when errors are managed. The paper specifically contrasts these relative belief intervals with the established Feldman-Cousins intervals for the described problem.
statistical-inferencebayesian-analysisuncertainty-quantificationparticle-physicsconfidence-intervalsdata-analysis
“Probability theory provides a definitive measure of evidence for or against an event, applicable in Bayesian analysis and imposing constraints on inferences.”
paper / benedictevans / Jun 7 / failed
paper / benedictevans / Jun 4 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 31 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 28 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 27 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 22 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 19 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 19 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 19 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 18 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 18 / failed
paper / benedictevans / May 13 / failed